Governmental Response

President Dilma Rousseff's Government Surprisingly Accepting of Protesters


According to the usual pattern of rebellions in history, when the people revolt against a government, said government tries its best to repress the dissonance and reassert their power. This, however, was not the case in Brazil.
 
In her formal statement concerning the protests, President Dilma Rousseff reminded the public, both domestic and foreign, that the violence did not “detract from the peaceful spirit of those who are out in the street.” She promptly met with leaders of the rebellion, and from there developed a “national pact.” This pact included five main points: continued assembly to consider political reform; making corruption a felony, rather than a misdemeanor; a promise to invest 50 billion reais ($23 billion) in city transport; more spending on health and education; and a reiteration of the importance of fiscal policy.

         It seems, however, that this solution is a little too good to be true. A quick fix in this situation is as impossible as in any other situation between a government and its people. Shortly after the proposal, it was discovered that the promised continued assembly was in fact unconstitutional. At the same time, Rousseff seemed to make little attempt at cutting the government “bloat” that would allow her to pay for the better services she had promised.

Of course such a turn must be expected. After all, the entire reason the people were protesting was to call attention to the corrupt politicians and misrepresentation. These high ranking officials, profiting from the subversion of the lower class, would hardly want to promote any change that would jeopardize their political, social, or economic standing, no matter what the views of the president may be.

Yet despite the seemingly gloomy prospects, some hope did come on June 25. On this date, the Brazilian Congress overwhelmingly rejected a very controversial amendment that would have lessened prosecutors’ powers to investigate the corruption of politicians. Defeating this amendment was a common grievance to protesters, so this rejection was a very significant move in their favor.

Overall small steps have been made by the government to concede to the protesters, but significant change is yet to come. With tensions still high, it will be interesting to see how the Brazilian officials continue to deal with this situation. One thing, however, is for certain and that is that the entire approach definitely does not match the typical approach of a government in such a situation.   

References:



No comments:

Post a Comment